A morally independent specification of society

Can society be specified independently of a constitutive reliance on moral terms? We are now in a position to answer this question. First, we could see that society can be considered to be a network of interactions, which are regulated by various protocols. We have also seen that there are plenty of protocols that are non-moral in nature. Law, etiquette and aesthetics can all be specified non-morally. Prudence also plays a role in society as an individual protocol, and prudence is quite distinct from morality as well. Morality can be considered its own kind of protocol again.

We are therefore faced with two questions: (1) Can a society exist without morality, and (2) is question (1) asking for an answer that is an analytic or a synthetic truth? That is, is it consistent to suppose that a society could exist without morality? It seems to me that it must be. For we can imagine a society that existed with prudence, etiquette, aesthetics and law, but without morality. An enlightened form of prudence might expand to fill in the space left by morality. This might theoretically occur in laissez-faire capitalism. Various models of a such a society, after all, are either not concerned with moral values or re-fashion morality in terms of enlightened self-interest. Ayn Rand's model springs to mind as an example of the latter. But if morality requires disinterest, as we have discussed, then this would be a society without morality. A merely prudential rationale in the society would not be enough to establish the existence of morality. Hence, society can be specified independently of a constitutive reliance on moral terms.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Philosophy of Al Qaeda

People out there seem pretty interested in the philosophy of Al Qaeda. Three of my most recent hits have involved searches on those words. Mine is the top-ranked page when "Al-Qaeda" is spelled with a hyphen, and the second-ranked page when it is not. And my page was only referring to someone else's blog page in the first place! So let's talk about the philosophy of Al Qaeda. Paul Berman wrote an excellent article about it. He identifies Sayyid Qutb as the most important philosopher behind the movement. Qutb is Qaeda's intellectual hero, its "Karl Marx". In this respect, Qutb's best known work is Milestones , his Das Kapital . Berman, however, calls attention to Qutb's deeper work, the enormous In the Shade of the Koran . It is full of literary beauty and deep ideas. Just because ideas are deep, however, does not mean that they are true, and many of Qutb's ideas, Berman argues, are indeed false. Qutb opposes the separation of church and s
Read more

Am I a reductive or non-reductive naturalist?

I tried to get The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding from the university library today after work, but the library still has limited hours until 7th March. It won't be open after business hours until Tuesday, by which time I will be busy rehearsing for my play, so I won't really be able to get to the library until 8th March anyway. I was only curious about the term anyway. But if attitudinalism is meant to be similar to non-cognitivism, then I am sure I will not accept that as an approach to ethics, because as I understand it, ethical non-cognitivism means that moral statements have no truth-value, which I cannot believe. They do have a truth-value; it is simply what determines that truth-value that can be problematic. The difficulty of classifying any view as non-naturalistic is, at bottom, the cost of allowing non-reductive versions of naturalism. Excuse me, WTF is non-reductive naturalism?? Some lecture notes from the University of Michigan
Read more

Rational Conlangs

My interest in rational conlangs has been revived. The specific catalyst is that I am trying to translate a book that I absolutely love, The Book of Matan, into one. One reason for this choice of book is that its English is very simple and readable. It does not use a vocabulary that is too obscure. But it carries an emotional, poetic beauty that reminds of me of the King James Bible. If any language should translate well into a rational conlang, I would hope it was of this kind. Another reason is that it is a logical extension of my interest in the book. It is a catalyst for me to read the book more than I otherwise would be inclined to do. It is like when, as a teenager, I would try translating The Hitch-hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy into a conlang. I had already read and loved the book. Translating it became an exercise in looking at it from a fresh perspective. The best conlang to me was Rick Morneau’s concept of a machine translation interlingua. To me it captured what I most
Read more