Kant and falsifiability

Is natural rights theory the only possible falsifiable moral theory, or can deontological theories, such as Kant's be falsifiable, for example? Well, Kant would claim that we have certain duties of virtue on the basis that we have a rational faculty. In particular, we must act as if the maxim of our actions were to become through our will a universal law of nature. Presumably, this ethic would be falsified if we did not have a rational faculty as well, because it presupposes a metaphysics in which we do have a rational faculty.

Of course, the ethic is definitely not falsifiable on that basis alone. Kant is trying to develop an ethics based on necessary presuppositions of a rational being. It seems strange that reflection on the logical requirements of a rational being could lead one to the kinds of substantive conclusions about morals that Kant wants to make, and that it should not be too difficult to prove that those logical steps are not deductively valid. Hence, the strong version of Kantianism, where these imperatives are entailed by our conception of the rational self, seems likely to be falsified.

Nevertheless, there is indeed a weaker version of such claims, whereby the imperatives are not necessary presuppositions of the rational self. They simply find their grounding in the fact that we are indeed rational beings. This kind of approach will prove fruitful in the same kinds of ways that natural rights were grounded in notions of us having a rational faculty.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Philosophy of Al Qaeda

People out there seem pretty interested in the philosophy of Al Qaeda. Three of my most recent hits have involved searches on those words. Mine is the top-ranked page when "Al-Qaeda" is spelled with a hyphen, and the second-ranked page when it is not. And my page was only referring to someone else's blog page in the first place! So let's talk about the philosophy of Al Qaeda. Paul Berman wrote an excellent article about it. He identifies Sayyid Qutb as the most important philosopher behind the movement. Qutb is Qaeda's intellectual hero, its "Karl Marx". In this respect, Qutb's best known work is Milestones , his Das Kapital . Berman, however, calls attention to Qutb's deeper work, the enormous In the Shade of the Koran . It is full of literary beauty and deep ideas. Just because ideas are deep, however, does not mean that they are true, and many of Qutb's ideas, Berman argues, are indeed false. Qutb opposes the separation of church and s
Read more

Actions Speak Louder Than Words

Do you see any conflict between your spending considerable money on the care of your mother and your principle of spreading out wealth to help the most people? Yes. In a sense, my spending money on my mother's care is in conflict with that principle. But so is the fact that I flew back to Australia to visit my daughters at Christmas. That money could also be better spent elsewhere. I've never claimed that I live my life perfectly in accordance with those principles of sharing my money as much as I should. Interview with Peter Singer by Princeton Alumni Weekly , January 26, 2000. Is Peter Singer a hypocrite? Lonnie Lee Best, from his excellent web page on " The Psychology of Hypocrisy ", defines a hypocrite as 'a person whose actions contradict his or her stated or internal beliefs. (Or vice versa.)' From the sections on " Singer's Mother " and " Singer's Donations ", it seems clear enough that Singer falls into this cat
Read more

Commensurability 5.0

Key concept: commensurability Dictionary Definition: measurability by a common standard (Based on definition of "commensurable" in WordNet 2.0 .) Substantive Account: of a claim, measurability of its truth or falsity by a common standard that falls along a continuum of degrees, or levels , of conduciveness to non-coercive agreement. I distinguish the following four levels: Level 1 Keyword: Commonality. UPDATE 2014/12/28: Could also be triviality. Necessary and sufficient condition: Pre-existing agreement about truth or falsity of claim. Examples: "The Pope is Catholic" is at level 1 because of pre-existing agreement of its truth. "The moon is made of green cheese" is at level 1 because of pre-existing agreement of its falsity. Additionally, non-trivial claims can be at level 1 relative to a particular discussion. For example, assumptions made in a scientific paradigm are at level 1 relative to all who share that paradigm. Level 2 Keywor
Read more